← All free resources

Four Routes Decision Guide

Choose between DIY, Rent, Borrow, and Embed for a specific workflow.

For: Sponsors, function leaders, and delivery teams
Use when: When deciding where delivery capacity should come from
Suggested time: 20 minutes · Version 1.0 · October 5, 2026

Use this guide to structure a discussion, then record your answers in the editable template or printable PDF. Use synthetic or authorized information. A named person owns each decision.

Compare the four routes

These are capacity choices inside the Internal Product House. A portfolio can use all four.

DIY
Someone already in the function builds a bounded solution. Check approved tools, scope, testing, time, and maintenance.
Rent
Use a vendor or platform. Check fit, permissions, integration, total cost, and vendor responsibilities.
Borrow
Use another internal team, a contractor, or professional services. Check access, capacity, handover, and ownership after delivery.
Embed
Dedicated delivery capacity sits with the function. Check demand, prioritization, technical standards, decision rights, and ongoing funding.
See a completed companion example

Illustrative responses for a fictional workflow. These are planning assumptions, not client results.

DIY
Consider for a narrow draft-only prototype with a capable owner.
Rent
Consider if an existing service-desk product already fits the approved policy-answer workflow.
Borrow
Borrow retrieval expertise for a scoped prototype with a documented handoff.
Embed
Consider after sustained demand justifies continuing domain-focused capacity.

Record the choice

No single score determines the answer. Compare problem fit, context and access, delivery capacity, continuity, and decision authority.

Chosen route and tradeoff
Which route fits now, and what alternative did you consider?
Long-term owner
Who supports the product after delivery?
Evidence that would change the route
What would make a different route preferable?
Next decision
Who decides and when?
See a completed companion example

Illustrative responses for a fictional workflow. These are planning assumptions, not client results.

Chosen route and tradeoff
Borrow for the pilot; compare Rent before committing a custom production build.
Long-term owner
Service-desk lead owns the workflow; platform partner owns technical support.
Evidence that would change the route
A suitable existing product, continuing product demand, or unavailable internal capacity.
Next decision
Sponsor reviews fit, cost, and support evidence after the synthetic test.

Record the next decision.

What will you do next, who owns it, and when will you review the evidence? Keep unresolved assumptions visible.

Continue with these tools.

By Vic Akosile · Built Into Work. Use and adapt for your own work or your team’s work; credit the source when sharing adaptations. These tools are discussion aids, not validated assessments. Fictional examples and proposed targets do not establish readiness for real use.