← All free resources

Five Decisions Worksheet

Define Problem, Product, People, Production, and Proof for one workflow.

For: Domain leaders and delivery partners
Use when: When turning an idea into a shared brief
Suggested time: 25 minutes · Version 1.0 · October 5, 2026

Use this guide to structure a discussion, then record your answers in the editable template or printable PDF. Use synthetic or authorized information. A named person owns each decision.

Make the five decisions

An editable companion to the SIOP worksheet. Use one workflow and keep the first result small.

1. Problem
What happens now, where does it break, who feels the cost, and what should improve?
2. Product
What must be produced, what is the smallest useful result, and what is excluded?
3. People
Who uses, contributes expertise, approves, builds, and owns it?
4. Production
What sources and access are required? How do reliability, errors, support, and maintenance work?
5. Proof
What evidence would make you continue, change, expand, or stop?
Next useful step
Name one action, owner, review date, and delivery route.
See a completed companion example

Illustrative responses for a fictional workflow. These are planning assumptions, not client results.

1. Problem
Analysts search inconsistent leave-policy documents and rework routine answers.
2. Product
A cited draft or escalation. Exclude eligibility decisions and automatic sending.
3. People
Analyst uses; specialist reviews; platform partner builds; service-desk lead owns.
4. Production
Approved synthetic corpus first; current policy versions; exception handling and manual fallback.
5. Proof
Compare total handling effort and quality; stop for unauthorized actions or missed eligibility escalation.
Next useful step
Borrow specialist support for a synthetic test; lead reviews in two weeks.

Record the next decision.

What will you do next, who owns it, and when will you review the evidence? Keep unresolved assumptions visible.

Continue with these tools.

By Vic Akosile · Built Into Work. Use and adapt for your own work or your team’s work; credit the source when sharing adaptations. These tools are discussion aids, not validated assessments. Fictional examples and proposed targets do not establish readiness for real use.